2008SEP021415

Image by bootload
Thoughts on Google Chrome
"… That means Google is slowly but surely working to erode Microsoft’s monopoly. If browsers provide a high-quality, universally popular, OS-independent platform for applications, OS vendors no longer have any particular advantage in the desktop applications market. …"
On the assumption that most users use this browser.
More browsers, more market split. Uneven as well. The question nobody has answered is how is this new Chrome browser going to get on computers? Downloaded by users? Mandated by companies? or shipped on new operating systems?
some time later…
"… As we saw with the example of search engines, a new competitor may split an existing market …"
This is a different beast.
It’s consumer binary software. You have to download it, install it, tune it, learn it. The browser is now what the OS was to applications. It’s just another hurdle for constrained users to jump. With search engines you just point your browser with a different url.
some time later…
"… Good lord did you even think about what you just wrote? Its a browser, not a torture device! …"
Keep your emotions in check, ad hominem.
and a bit later…
"… Good lord did you even think about what you just wrote? Its a browser, not a torture device! …"
Can you explain the how this language adds to the discussion without resorting to ridicule?
"… I could care less about your thread …"
Chrome has the potential to be just as closed as MS (bad), Apple because the real power is in who controls the commits. Do you have any worthwhile to add about how Chrome could become another closed system?
The next day
I had some time yesterday to read through the entire document. This particular section to me is probably the most significant. Google has done some great work. They have released all this work with an opensource license, componentise it, document it. One thing they didn’t decouple is the use of their pageranked testing.
Testing for the browser will be against their own data set. Google controls the data collection. And while they are fanatical about not altering the algorythm (cf: Joel Spolskys explanation of the Google term "Jew" and how google has taken great pains by taking out an advert explaining why they do not make exceptions and the ranking is a reflection of how people use the data).
They do however control how the browser will behave against their dataset. The browser is automatically tuned to perform best on the pages google ranks. Think about the implications of that.
next >>>
Universal Search: Not All Blends are Created Equal
Searchers are more inclined to interact and engage with blended results than text-based results. Here’s how blended results can impact your search marketing and optimization efforts on Google, Bing, and Yahoo. …
Read more on Search Engine Watch
SearchCap: The Day In Search, October 14, 2010
Google said it earned $ 7.29 billion in Q3 2010, an increase of 23% compared to the same period in 2009. Quarterly growth was 7%. Although these numbers aren’t broken out (update: see below), the Eric Schmidt quote included in the press release highlighted display and mobile as having “significant momentum.”
Read more on Search Engine Land
Pentagon Releases Tally of Dead Iraqis
Edit or’s Note: From the start of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003, the Bush administration refused to provide figures on the number of Iraqis killed, yet disputed estimates of war-related deaths that ranged up to one million.
Read more on consortiumnews.com